Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2025
Accepted
December 16, 2025
Published
December 16, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of learning media for the Fiqh of funeral rites at the secondary level, a topic that often creates pedagogical anxiety due to its sensitive and abstract nature. This qualitative study focuses on two institutions: Nurul Muttaqin Junior High School in Indonesia and Chariyathamsuksa Foundation School in Thailand, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results reveal two fundamentally different pedagogical models. Nurul Muttaqin implements a systematic, technology-integrated model, using videos and mannequins to reduce anxiety and ensure technical accuracy. Conversely, Chariyathamsuksa employs a communal, embodied learning model with students as proxies to demystify death and transmit values. This study demonstrates that the choice of media is not merely a technical decision but a profound reflection of institutional philosophy and socio-cultural context. The implications of this study challenge monolithic views of Islamic education and offer global insights into pedagogical adaptations for teaching sensitive religious materials.

Keywords

Pedagogical Anxiety Embodied Learning Technological Mediation Comparative Islamic Education Funeral Rites Pedagogy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fatchurrohman, R., Prawidya Lestari, & Najmee Bindulem. (2025). Instructional Media for Fiqh of Funeral Rites: A Comparative Analysis in Indonesia and Thailand . Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas Dan Intelektualitas, 13(2), 175–194. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.unwahas.ac.id/PROGRESS/article/view/14520
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Books
  3. 1.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
  4. 2.Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
  5. 3.Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
  6. 4.Philip, J. (1968). Life in Classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  7. 5.Saukah, A., & Waseso, M. G. (2002). Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Ilmiah. UM Press.
  8. 6.Zaman, M. Q. (2002). The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton University Press.
  9. Journals
  10. 7.Abdulloh, A., & Buerah, D. (2019). Peran Pondok Pesantren dalam Memelihara Budaya Melayu Muslim di Thailand Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 19(1), 1-22.
  11. 8.Anas, A. (2011). Problematika Pembelajaran Fiqih di Madrasah Aliyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 175-190.
  12. 9.Fauzi, M., & Adha, M. M. (2022). Adaptasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam di Thailand Selatan: Studi Kasus di Sekolah-sekolah Swasta. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Hikmah, 10(2), 112-128.
  13. 10.Gunawan, I. (2017). Penggunaan Manekin dalam Simulasi Medis untuk Mengurangi Hambatan Psikologis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia, 6(3), 210-217.
  14. 11.Hasan, N. (2007). Islamic Education in Southeast Asia. Studia Islamika, 14(1), 1-10.
  15. 12.Hidayat, R. (2020). Mengelola Kecemasan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Topik Sensitif. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling, 6(1), 24-31.
  16. 13.Karim, A. (2019). Embodied Learning in Islamic Education: A Phenomenological Approach. Religious Education, 114(4), 458-472.
  17. 14.Maghfiroh, L. (2020). Pengembangan Alat Peraga Tiga Dimensi untuk Pembelajaran Praktik Ibadah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Keagamaan, 1(1), 45-58.
  18. 15.Nel, P. J. (1984). The Role of the Teacher as a Model in Affective Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(2), 147-158.
  19. 16.Novitasari, D., & Retnowati, E. (2022). Pendidikan Kematian (Death Education) sebagai Bagian dari Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(1), 89-102.
  20. 17.Nuryah, S., & Imron, A. (2023). Studi Komparatif Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam di Indonesia dan Thailand Selatan. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(1), 55-70.
  21. 18.Saputro, A. D., & Nugroho, A. (2023). Model Pembelajaran Fiqih Berbasis Proyek Simulasi untuk Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(1), 34-49.
  22. 19.Suherman, A. (2022). Pengaruh Media Video Pembelajaran terhadap Hasil Belajar Fiqih Siswa Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 12(2), 150-165.
  23. 20.Taufiq, M. (2018). Tradisi Talaqqi dalam Pembelajaran Islam Klasik dan Relevansinya di Era Digital. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(2), 201-222.
  24. 21.Wahyuni, S. (2021). The Role of Teachers in the Era of Digital Technology: As Facilitators and Curators of Content. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 112-125.
  25. 22.Zulfa, L. N., Azhari, N., Fuadi, S. I., Lestari, P., & Ulumuddin, I. K. (2025). FIKISMART: Website-Based Learning Media for Islamic Religious Education Subjects, Topic of Fiqh for Middle Schools. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 175-199.
  26. Web Sources
  27. 23.Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Panduan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti. Accessed from kemenag.go.id.
  28. 24.UNESCO. (2021). Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap. Accessed from unesco.org.