Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 19, 2025
Published
June 27, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 35 Download : 26

Main Article Content

Abstract

Learning the history of Islamic culture is often connoted with monotonous and rote learning, whereas this learning can actually also be used to develop attitudes and skills. This study aims to examine the integration of four learning theories to improve student creativity. This study is a qualitative study with a case study approach. Data collection techniques are carried out with documentation, observation and interviews with objects and subjects of research. Data analysis is carried out by; collecting data, grouping, categorizing, finding appropriate themes, and interpreting. The results of the study indicate that the integration of four learning theories in learning the history of Islamic culture is carried out according to the needs and suitability of learning objectives in each discussion theme. So that this integration is designed based on three categories of learning objectives, namely: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. So that this integration has significantly been able to increase students' cognitive, affective and psychomotor competencies. Therefore, this study can have an impact on the development of interesting Islamic cultural history learning and is able to increase student activity.


Keywords: Four Theories of Learning, Integration, Activeness, Learning, SKI.

Keywords

Four Theories of Learning Integration, Activeness Learning SKI

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Marpuah, E., Fithria, M., Rif’adina, S. F., Averus, A. E. I., & Marlangen, L. W. P. (2025). Integration of Four Learning Theories to Increase Student Activeness in SKI Learning at Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas Dan Intelektualitas, 13(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.31942/pgrs.v13i1.12686
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103(3). https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
  2. Anam S, M., & Dwiyogo, W. D. (2019). Teori Belajar Behavioristik Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Universitas Negeri Malang, 2.
  3. Arab, M., Ghavami, B., Lakeh, M. A., Esmaeilpoor, S., Yaghmaie, M., & Hosseini-Zijoud, S.-M. (2015). Learning Theory: Narrative Review. International Journal of Medical Reviews, 2(3).
  4. Ardi, Z., & Sisin, M. (2018). The Contribution of Assertive Technique Behavioral Counseling to Minimize the Juvenile Delinquency Behavior. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan , 6(2), 67–77. Http://Jurnal.Konselingindonesia.Com.
  5. Astutik, U. W., & Nurdianzah, E. (2024). Spiritual Approach to Improve Anti-Bullying Based Learning at MTs NU Nurul Huda Kudus. Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas Dan Intelektualitas, 12(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.31942/pgrs.v12i1.10697
  6. Bender, T. (2023). DISCUSSION-BASED ONLINE TEACHING TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING: Theory, Practice, and Assessment: SECOND EDITION. In Discussion-Based Online Teaching to Enhance Student Learning: Theory, Practice, and Assessment: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444282
  7. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. In SIMULTANEOUSLY IN THE DOMINION OF CANADA. SIMULTANEOUSLY IN THE DOMINION OF CANADA. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v03n01_03
  8. Burns, R. (2020). Motivation and personality. In The Adult Learner at Work (pp. 186–216). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134213-8
  9. Cattaneo, K. H. (2017). Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.237
  10. Fithriyah, D. N. (2024). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Aplikasinya dalam Pembelajaran. Jemi, 2(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.61815/jemi.v2i1.341
  11. Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
  12. Hapudin, M. S. (2021). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran: menciptakan pembelajaran yang kreatif dan efektif. In Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran.
  13. Henry, T., & Murray, J. (2018). How does it feel? The affective domain and undergraduate student perception of fieldwork set in a broad pedagogical perspective. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018pp45-74
  14. Illeris, K. (2018). An overview of the history of learning theory. European Journal of Education, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12265
  15. Imaduddin, A. (2017). Spiritualitas Dalam Konteks Konseling. Journal of Innovative Counseling, 1(1).
  16. Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2023). The use and application of learning theory in learning analytics: a scoping review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09340-3
  17. Khan, S., Inamdar, M. N. K., Munaga, S., Khare, N., & Farooq, M. U. (2020). Development of psychomotor skills in dentistry based on motor learning principles: A review. In World Journal of Dentistry (Vol. 11, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1734
  18. Lathifah, D. N. (2021). Implementasi Teori Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme pada Pembelajaran PAI di SDN 05 Tubanan-Kembang-Jepara. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 2(2), 22–31.
  19. Leeder, T. M. (2022). Behaviorism, Skinner, and Operant Conditioning: Considerations for Sport Coaching Practice. Strategies, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2022.2052776
  20. Martimianakis, M. A., Michalec, B., Lam, J., Cartmill, C., Taylor, J. S., & Hafferty, F. W. (2015). Humanism, the hidden curriculum, and educational reform: A scoping review and thematic analysis. In Academic Medicine (Vol. 90, Issue 11 Association of American Medical Colleges Medical Education Meeting). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000894
  21. Miles, M. B. and A. M. H. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (terjemahan. UI Press.
  22. Nurdianzah, E. (2020). Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam dalam Tradisi Jawa (Kajian Historis Pendidikan Islam dalam Dakwah Walisanga). Jurnal PROGRESS, 8(1).
  23. Nurdianzah, E., Azizah, N., & Zulfa, L. N. (2024). Maximizing the Use of Educational Media in Forming Anti-Bullying Values in School in Post-Truth Era. Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal, 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/ath.v9i1.33798
  24. Nurdianzah, E., Mirza, M. W., & Anas, R. (2023). NILAI-NILAI PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DALAM SEJARAH DAKWAH NABI MUHAMMAD DI MADINAH SEBAGAI SARANA PENENEMAN KARAKTER PADA REMAJA. Jurnal Progress: Wahana Kreativitas Dan Intelektualitas, 11(November), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.31942/pgrs.v11i2.9865
  25. Nurhadi. (2020). Teori Kognitivisme serta Aplikasi dalam Pembelajaran. EDISI: Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 2(1), 77–95.
  26. Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
  27. Pettalongi, S. S. (2013). ISLAM DAN PENDIDIKAN HUMANIS DALAM RESOLUSI KONFLIK SOSIAL. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXII(2), 172–182.
  28. Prabawa, E. A. dan Z. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa pada Model Project Based Learning Bernuansa Etnomatematika. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Eduction Research, 6(1).
  29. Qodir, A., & Pedagogik, J. (2017). Teori Belajar Humanistik Dalam. TEORI BELAJAR HUMANISTIK DALAM MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA, ( Jurnal Pedagogik, Vol. 04 No. 02, Juli-Desember 2017 ISSN : 2354-7960, E-ISSN : 2528-5793), 04(02), 189.
  30. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
  31. Rasyid, A. (2018). PROBLEMATIKA PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH KEBUDAYAAN ISLAM DI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH AL-KHAIRAAT PAKULI KABUPATEN SIGI. Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56488/scolae.v1i1.8
  32. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  33. Stephens, M., & Ormandy, P. (2019). An Evidence-based Approach to Measuring Affective Domain Development. Journal of Professional Nursing, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.12.004
  34. Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. ISLAMIKA, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v1i2.208
  35. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
  36. Thoyibah, F. A. (2024). ANALISIS MATERI PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH KEBUDAYAAN ISLAM DI MADRASAH. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 19(1), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55558/alihda.v19i1.197
  37. Umam, M. C. (2020). IMPLEMENTASI TEORI BELAJAR HUMANISTIK CARL R. ROGERS PADA PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM. Tadrib, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v5i2.3305
  38. Umar, Ockta, Y., & Mardesia, P. (2023). A Correlational Study: Pedagogical and professional competence of physical education teachers in relation to the implementation of the Merdeka curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12). https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12380
  39. Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505
  40. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods. SAGE publications.
  41. Yuliandri, M. (2017). Pembelajaran Inovatif di Sekolah Berdasarkan Paradigma Teori Belajar Humanistik. Journal of Moral and Civic Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/8851412020171264