Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 8, 2026
Published
July 20, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 11 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

Corruption is a significant issue that can hinder the achievement of good governance in various countries, including Indonesia. Although it has a Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the effectiveness of corruption eradication in Indonesia still faces numerous institutional, regulatory, and policy consistency challenges. Conversely, Singapore, through its Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), has managed to maintain a consistently low level of corruption. This study aims to analyze the corruption eradication strategies implemented by the CPIB and identify opportunities for their adaptation in anti-corruption policy reform in Indonesia. The study used the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for selected scientific articles that met the inclusion criteria, supported by statistical data on the development of the CPIB's handling of corruption cases for the period 2021-2025. The analysis was conducted using thematic analysis with NVivo 12 software to identify themes, relationship patterns, and dominant factors influencing the effectiveness of corruption eradication. The research findings indicate that the success of the CPIB is influenced by the integration of institutional independence, a strong legal framework, political support, oversight mechanisms, the use of technology, anti-corruption education, public participation, and a consistent and sustainable culture of integrity. This research also demonstrates that the CPIB model cannot be directly implemented in Indonesia but requires adaptation through a selective policy adaptation approach, tailored to the characteristics of the national legal, political, and institutional systems. The research findings provide conceptual insights into the success factors of the CPIB anti-corruption model and serve as a reference for developing more effective and sustainable anti-corruption policy reforms in Indonesia.

Keywords

corruption CPIB Singapore anti-corruption policy institutional independence policy adaptation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Amelia, A. W., Anabila, K., & Zahra, N. A. (2025). Peran Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi ( KPK ) Dalam Menangani Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia. 2(April).
  2. Boin, A., Fahy, L. A., & Hart, P. (2020). Guardians of public value: How public organisations become and remain institutions. Guardians of Public Value: How Public Organisations Become and Remain Institutions, 1–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4
  3. Carrasco, D., & Mediano, A. P. (2021). Tolerance of Corruption Among Students in Latin America. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75746-5
  4. Chumachenko, D., Yemelyanov, V., Zhovnirchyk, Y., Bandura, I., & Karpeko, N. (2021). apuntesuniversitarios.upeu.edu.pe. 11(3), 183–196.
  5. Dwi Cahyani, T., Helmi Md Said, M., & Sayuti Hassan, M. (2023). A Comparison Between Indonesian And Malaysian Anti-Corruption Laws. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 10(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a7
  6. Ginanjar, D., & Purnama, W. W. (2023). Optimizing Legal Strategies: Combating Corruption through Anti-Corruption Education in Universities. Veteran Law Review, 6(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6i2.6477
  7. Gurcan, F., Ayaz, A., Gokce, G., & Dalveren, M. (2023). Business Intelligence Strategies , Best Practices , and Latest Trends : Analysis of Scientometric Data from 2003 to 2023 Using Machine Learning.
  8. Hauser, C., & Hogenacker, J. (2014). Do Firms Proactively Take Measures to Prevent Corruption in Their International Operations? European Management Review, 11(3–4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12035
  9. Heilbrunn, S., & Iannone, R. L. (2019). Neoliberalist Undercurrents in Entrepreneurship Policy. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 5(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957519861489
  10. Idang Ramadhan, Yunita Kusumaningrum, & Hanik Tri Wilujeng. (2024). Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa melalui Proyek Kewarganegaraan Antikorupsi di SMK Pawyatan Daha 2 Kediri. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v3i1.3091
  11. Kalantaryan, E. (2025). Culture Of Corruption As A Key Issue In Anti-Corruption Methodology And Policies ( On Examples Of Italy And Armenia). 16(1), 69–85.
  12. Kenneth, N. (2024). Maraknya Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia Tahun ke Tahun. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 2(1), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v2i1.1645
  13. Konoplia, Y. (2025). Regulatory And Legal Framework For Combating Corruption In Public Procurement: Current State And Challenges. Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law, 2025(2), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2025.02.040
  14. Kristiono, N. (2020). The Implementation of Anti-Corruption Education in Texmaco Vocational High School Pemalang. 418(Acec 2019), 203–208.
  15. Mahendra, J. R., Setiawan, E., & Van Hellend, A. F. (2024). Corruption Eradication in Four Asian Countries: a Comparative Legal Analysis. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 2(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v2i2.98
  16. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2005). 2005--March and Olsen--Elaborating the New Institutionalsim. Theory, 11, 1–28.
  17. Mohamad, A. N., Sylvester, A., & Campbell-meier, J. (2022). Towards A Taxonomy of Emerging Topics in Open Government Data : A Bibliometric Mapping Approach. 7, 2553–2562.
  18. Nani, Y. N., Abdussamad, J., Mozin, S. Y., & Tohopi, R. (2025). Integrating Ethical Values and New Public Services : Strengthening Reform and Anti-Corruption in Indonesia. 12(2), 236–249.
  19. Nguyen, N. A., & Nguyen, D. N. (2025). Anti-corruption in Vietnam - an institutional analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2460320
  20. Nonik, V., Tkachenko, A., Arifkhodzhaieva, T., Halunko, O., & Trehub, D. (2024). Enhancing governance through anti-corruption strategies: Exemplary approaches and obstacles. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 2024ss0704. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0704
  21. Nugraha, A. R., Sjoraida, D. F., Erdinaya, L. K., & Komariah, K. (2020). Komunikasi humas pemerintahan kabupaten/kota di Jawa Barat melalui media digital Instagram. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 8(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v8i2.26407
  22. Nurinawati1,Fredrick, L. (2023). Psychocentrum Review. 62(58). https://doi.org/10.26539/pcr.511383.The
  23. Peters, B. G. (2023). Good governance. The Elgar Companion to the OECD, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886872.00033
  24. Price, D. (2024). Political Revenge? Downgrading Indonesia’s KPK From Hero to Villain. Politics and Governance, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7907
  25. Putri, R. S., Sukarna, K., & Sudarmanto, K. (2023). Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Melakukan Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Journal Juridisch, 1(3), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.26623/jj.v1i3.7919
  26. Quah, J. S. T. (2017). Singapore’s success in combating corruption: lessons for policy makers. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2017-0030
  27. Quah, J. S. T. (2020). Combating corruption in Singapore: a comparative analysis of two scandals. Public Administration and Policy, 23(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-11-2019-0031
  28. Quah, J. S. T. (2022a). Leadership and culture in combating corruption: a comparative analysis. Public Administration and Policy, 25(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-05-2022-0043
  29. Quah, J. S. T. (2022b). Lee Kuan Yew ’ s role in minimising corruption in Singapore. 25(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-04-2022-0037
  30. Raza, M. A. A., Yan, C., & Bilal, M. (2022). Impact of Governance and State Fragility Determinants on State Legitimacy in Emerging Asian Economies. Governance and Society Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/gsr.11.05
  31. Rizky Subhan. (2025). Dampak Korupsi terhadap perekonomian di Indonesia. Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.70292/pchukumsosial.v2i3.101
  32. Rusdiana, E., Zaman, N., Darnela, L., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Preventing The Politicisation of Corruption Crime Law Enforcement Based on Local Wisdom. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.37429
  33. Samaha, K., Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2015). The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.11.001
  34. Samudra, A. A. (2025). Integration of Public Administration and Governance Theory To Combat Corruption in Indonesia. Public Administration Issues, 2025(6), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-6-117-140
  35. Saragih, N., Mansur, S., Wahyuti, T., & Sudarmanti, R. (2021). The Impact of Students’ Understanding of Anti-Corruption Values on Anti-Corruption Behavior. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v37i1.6310
  36. Sari, E., Mulyadi, M., Yatimah, D., & Maulana, R. (2021). Model Manajemen Pendidikan Antikorupsi Berbasis Kepemimpinan Kenabian Anti-corruption Education Management Model Based on Prophetic Leadership Behavior Pendahuluan Korupsi merupakan sebuah fenomena. 12(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v12i2.2495
  37. Sosial, S., Budaya, D. A. N., & Analisis, K. (2025). Kriminologis Terhadap Praktik Korupsi Di Lembaga Pemerintahan Social Structure And Culture Of Corruption : A Criminological Analysis Of Corruption Practices In Government Institutions. 14057–14066.
  38. Sukarno, M., Rodriguez, M. J., & Nursamsiyah, N. (2024). E-Government Development on Control Corruption: A Lesson Learned from Singapore. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.21447
  39. Wahyuningsih, T., Hasanah, S., Albadani, Q., & Alawiyah, M. (2025). Dampak Korupsi Terhaadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Politik. 2(1), 0–4.
  40. Wal, Z. Van Der. (2022). Singapore ’ s Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau : Guardian of Public Integrity. 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51701-4
  41. Wedha, Y. Y., Wijaya, I. M. H., Mukti, H., & Turymshayeva, A. (2025). Unraveling the Complex Policies Regulating Conflicts of Interest and Criminal Corruption. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i1.486