Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT School Operational Assistance (BOS) is an effort by the Ministry of Education and Culture to support education funds for students at the elementary school (SD), junior high school (SMP) and senior high school (SMA) levels. School Operations Assistance (BOS) has been implemented since July 2005. This study aims to examine to find out and understand the basis for judges' considerations in deciding cases against perpetrators of corruption crimes, and mechanisms for returning state losses in corruption crimes. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach and this research uses a statutory approach, because various legal rules will be studied. Based on such considerations, the Panel of Judges concluded that the element "Which is detrimental to state finances or the country's economy", as stipulated in article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999, concerning the Eradication of Corruption Criminal Penalties as amended and supplemented by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Ri Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes has been fulfilled as a result of the defendant's actions. The mechanism for recovering State losses due to Corruption Crimes is carried out through court decisions and if the defendant is unable to recover state losses, the defendant will be subject to an additional period of confinement or if the defendant has property obtained from the conduct of the Corruption Act The Prosecutor's Office can auction the property. Keywords: School Operational Assistance, Corruption Crimes, Mechanisms.

Article Details

References

  1. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
  2. Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
  3. Jaya, Benedict, Marwan Mas, and Abd. Haris Hamid. “Analisis Hukum Penjatuhan Pidana Oleh Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.†Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law 4, no. 1 (2021): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v4i1.1179.
  4. johny ibrahim. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. malang: banyumedia publishing, 2006.
  5. Mahfuz, Abdul Latif. “Dengan Predicate Crime Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Muka Persidangan Pengadilan Tipikor Palembang,†n.d.
  6. Melati, Ririn, Siti Rodiah, and Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Proactive Fraud Audit, Whistleblowing, Dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Bos (Studi Empiris Pada Sekolah-Sekolah Di Pekanbaru).†Accounting and Management Journal 6, no. 1 (2022): 17–25. https://journal2.unusa.ac.id/index.php/AMJ/article/view/2378.
  7. Nurmayani. “Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri Sukarame.†Fiat Justisia:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v6no3.82.
  8. Pardede, Lukman, and Hotmaida Simanjuntak. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kepala Sekolah Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah.†Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 2 (2021): 893–904.
  9. Soerjono Seokanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. jakarta: UI Press, 1981.
  10. Kontan. “Ubah Kebijakan, Mulai Tahun Ini Penyaluran Dana BOS Langsung Ke Sekolah,†2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ubah-kebijakan-mulai-tahun-ini-penyaluran-dana-bos-langsung-ke-sekolah.
  11. Zainudin, Moh. “Penyelewengan Dana Bos Dapat Terjadi Karena Kurangnya Transparansi Pihak Sekolah Terhadap Publik.†Jurnal Jendela Hukum 6, no. 2 (2021): 32–38. https://doi.org/10.24929/fh.v6i2.1558.