Main Article Content

Abstract

The “tahun duda” tradition practiced in Pidodo Village, Karangtengah District,
Demak Regency, is a social custom that restricts a widowed or divorced man from
remarrying before the completion of one year after divorce or the death of his wife.
This practice has no normative basis in the Qur’an, Hadith, or classical Islamic
jurisprudence concerning marriage, thus raising questions regarding its legal
status in Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the tradition from the perspectives
of ‘urf and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The research employs a normative legal method
with conceptual and case approaches, relying primarily on library research
supported by field data as social illustration. The findings indicate that the tahun
duda tradition does not possess binding legal force in Islamic law. It may be
categorized as valid ‘urf (ʿurf ṣaḥīḥ) if understood merely as a social ethic without
theological implications. However, if it is believed to bring metaphysical
consequences or positioned as a religious obligation, it potentially constitutes
invalid ‘urf (ʿurf fāsid). Therefore, the tradition cannot be equated with Islamic
legal provisions, and its legitimacy depends on how it is socially interpreted and
practiced.

Keywords

Tahun_Duda ‘Urf Hukum Syariah

Article Details

References

  1. A’rifah, Alda Nihayatul, Muhid, Achmadana Syachrizal MF, & Andris Nurita. “Analisis Hadis Tatayyur Perspektif Kiai Sholeh Darat: Tinjauan Pemikiran Al-Ghazali.” Tajdid 23, no. 2 (2024): 474–97.
  2. Dinarti, Yetri, & Zainal Azwar. “Tradisi Marhaban Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah (Studi Kasus Di Semurup Kabupaten Kerinci).” El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (2024): 362–73.
  3. Fadhlan, Muhammad, Henti Fauziah, & Yudina Anggita. “Analisis Syarat Rukun Pernikahan Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia.” JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendekia 2, no. 1 (2025): 792–98.
  4. Fauzi. “‘Urf and Its Role in The Development of Fiqh: Comparative Study of Famliy Law Between Egypt and Indonesia.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 1 (2024): 346–71. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.23968.
  5. Fauziah. “Konsep ’Urf Dalam Pandangan Ulama Ushul Fiqh (Tela’ah Historis).” Nuraini 14, no. 2 (2025): 15–25.
  6. Fikri, Muhamad, M.Rifki Alfa Rizki, Alif Fazri Ramadhan, & Hikmatullah. “Perkawinan Dan Kewarisan Dalam Perspektif Maqasid Al- Syari’ah.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 1 (2026): 4759–74. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1. 3887.
  7. Harisudin, M Noor. “‘Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam (Fiqh) Nusantara.” Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam 20, no. 1 (2022): 66–86. https://doi.org/10.24252/jumdpi.v20i1.2311.
  8. Hidayatus, Syamraeni, Sholichah Adam, & Hafidz Al. “Transformasi Nilai Religius Di Era Digital : Analisis Literatur Berdasarkan Tujuan Hifz Al- ‘ Aql Kehidupan Manusia , Termasuk Dalam Hal Pemahaman Dan Praktik Nilai-Nilai Antara Nilai Religius Dan Era Digital . Adapun Hasil Penelitian Dari Effendi , Lukma.” Socio Religia 05, no. 02 (2024): 93–109. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.24042/sr.v5i2.25552.
  9. Ja’far, Kumedi. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Arjasa Pratama, 2021.
  10. Kholidah. “Otoritas "Urf Dalam Penalaran Hukum Islam.” Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan 8, no. 2 (2022): 242–54.
  11. Kurob, Abdullah Kasyiful, & Muhammad Sirojuddin. “Fenomena Larangan Adat Pernikahan Antara Masyarakat Desa Bungah Dengan Masyarakat Mesa Bedanten Menurut Prespektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 05, no. 2 (2024): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.36835/mabahits.v5i02 1888.
  12. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
  13. Nadia, Haiza. “Tradisi Pantangan Menikah Bulan Suro Di Lenteng Sumenep Madura.” An-Nawazil: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah Kontemporer 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.69784/annawazil.v5i1.75.
  14. Rizal, Fitra. “Penerapan ‘Urf Sebagai Metode Dan Sumber Hukum.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 2 (2019): 155–76.
  15. Rizhan, Afrinald. “Kedudukan Al- ‘ Adah Dan Al - ‘ Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam.” Gagasan Hukum 6, no. 01 (2024): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v6i01.19526.
  16. Soekanto, Soerjono, & Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2001.
  17. Wahyuni, Indar. “Menguak Mitos Tahun Duda Dari Catatan Pernikahan Perspektif Hukum Islam Di Kabupaten Pati.” An-Nidzam Vol. 5, no. 1 (2022): 139–65.
  18. Wandi, Sulfan. “Eksistensi ‘Urf Dan Adat Kebiasaan Sebagai Dalil Fiqh.” Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 2, no. 1 (2020): 181–96. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v2i1.3111.