Article Sidebar

Download
pdf

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the role of the Commercial Court in executing decisions from the Industrial Relations Court (PHI), which often face technical and procedural obstacles despite having permanent legal force. The main barriers to the execution of PHI decisions are the low level of compliance by employers with the decisions and the high costs and lengthy time required for the execution process. The Commercial Court, with its more efficient procedures, can serve as an alternative to address these barriers, especially in cases involving companies facing financial difficulties. This research aims to analyze the legal construction of executing PHI decisions through the Commercial Court and provide recommendations for improving the existing legal system. The research method used is normative legal research with approaches based on legislation, case law, and historical analysis, which leads to the conclusion that the use of the Commercial Court can improve execution efficiency and provide legal certainty. It is recommended that there be stronger synergy between industrial relations law and commercial law, as well as regulatory updates to support the implementation of fairer and more efficient executions.

Keywords

Commercial Court Execution of Decisions Industrial Relations Court Legal Certainty Bankruptcy

Article Details

References

  1. Alandi, Hansen, and Dian Ety Mayasari. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Menyelesaikan Perselisihan Pekerja.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum 4, no. 2 (2023): 31–51. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v4i2.70.
  2. Fatimah, Yani Nur. “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Pekerja/Buruh Yang Di Putus Hubungan Kerja.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 10, no. 2 (2015): 215. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v10i2.4954.
  3. Harahap, Maura Meralda. “Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Oleh Karyawan / Buruh Akibat Tidak Dieksekusinya Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial ( Studi Kasus Putusan No . 20 / Pdt . Sus - Pkpu / 2019 / Pn Niaga Mdn.” Jurnal Law of Deli Sumatera Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum I, no. I (2021): 68–75.
  4. Hendri Jayadi. Buku Ajar Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media, 2021.
  5. Herlina, Herlina, Ilham Abbas, and Andi Risma. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kurator Atas Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit.” Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56087/qawaninjih.v3i2.375.
  6. Hudyarto, Hudyarto. “Pertanggungjawaban Putusan Pailit Perseroan Terbatas.” Binamulia Hukum 10, no. 1 (2021): 91–106. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v10i1.444.
  7. Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.
  8. Perusahaan, Pekerja Di. “Efektivitas Eksekusi Terhadap Pengusaha Yang Tidak Membayar Pesangon Pekerja Di Perusahaan.” Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 4, no. 3 (2022).
  9. Rebecca Purba, Safina Nabila Fikrie, Diva Salsabila Ferdiansyah, Angelia Carla, Nafisa Verlee Ameeralia, and Andriyanto Adhi Nugroho. “Keabsahan Permohonan Pailit Yang Diajukan Buruh Terhadap Perusahaan Terkait Pemenuhan Haknya.” Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2023): 259–69. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1814.
  10. Shubhan, M. Hadi. “Fenomena Hukum Pengajuan Kepailitan Terhadap Pengusaha Oleh Pekerja Karena Hak Pekerja Yang Tidak Dibayar Pengusaha.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 2 (2020): 519. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2589.
  11. Tobing, Christina NM. “Menggagas Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Bingkai Ius Constituendum Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan / Initiating an Industrial Relations Court in the Framework of Ius Constituendum As an Effort To Realize Legal Certainty and Jus.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 2 (2018): 297. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.297-326.