Article Sidebar

Download
pdf

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the suboptimal implementation of special adjudication by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, particularly regarding the compensation payment mechanism for losses caused by maladministration in public services. Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2018 serves as the legal foundation and addresses issues related to the mechanism in order to uphold the principles of good governance. The focus of this study is the compensation payment mechanism in special adjudication carried out by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to analyze the compensation payment mechanism and to identify obstacles in its implementation. The research employs a qualitative method aimed at analyzing phenomena experienced by the research subjects. A statutory approach is applied, specifically referring to Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2018.


The results of the study indicate that: (1) The compensation payment mechanism in special adjudication conducted by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, based on Presidential Regulation Number 31 of 2018, begins with the issuance of a special adjudication decision by the Ombudsman—which is final and binding—and proceeds to the execution of compensation payment by the public service institutions proven to have committed maladministration. (2) The obstacles in implementing the compensation payment mechanism in special adjudication include limited budget, low awareness among government institutions, and lack of public knowledge. Moreover, the absence of strict sanctions against institutions that fail to implement adjudication decisions has hindered its effectiveness.


 

Keywords

Special Adjudication Compensation Payment Maladministration

Article Details

References

  1. Galang, A. (n.d.). Hukum Kelembagaan Negara.
  2. Huda, M., & Akbar, A. (n.d.). Wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Menjalankan Fungsi Ajudikasi Khusus (Analisis Peraturan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2018 Tentang Mekanisme Dan Tata Cara Ajudikasi Khusus).
  3. Masthuri Budi. (2005). Masturi, Budhi. (2005). Mengenal Ombudsman Indonesia. 8.
  4. Muslich Anshori, S. I. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (1st ed.). Airlangga University Press.
  5. Pratiwie, D. W. (n.d.). Urgensi Keberadaan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Good Governance (Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 Tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia). Universitas Gama Mahakam Samarinda.
  6. Peraturan dan Undang-Undang
  7. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.
  8. Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 Tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.
  9. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelayanan Publik, Pub. L. No. 25, 49 (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38748/uu-no-25-tahun-
  10. BAPPENAS RI. (1945). Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Warga Dan Negara, 1945, 1–166. https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/uud_1945.pdf
  11. Peraturan Ombudsman Nomor 31 Tahun 2018 Tentang Mekanisme Dan Tata Cara Ajudikasi Khusus.
  12. Jurnal
  13. Chaerul, A, A. (2020). Penerapan Ajudikasi Khusus oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Terhadap Penyelenggara Negara yang Melakukan Maladministrasi. jurisprudentie.
  14. Djoanda, M. (2010). Wujud Ganti Rugi Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Sasi, 16(4).
  15. Hussain, A., & Choi, Y. (2019). The Role of Public Participation in Good Governance. Journal of Governance Studies, 15, 3.
  16. Jamilah, W. (2022). Aktivitas Corporate Social Responbility (CSR) PT. Sinar Halomoan Dalam Mengembangkan Fasilitas Pendidikan di Desa Pasir Jae Kecamatan Sosa Kabupaten Padang Lawas. UIN SUSKA Riau.
  17. Kadarsih, S. (2010). Tugas Dan Wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Pelayanan Publik Menurut Uu No. 37 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.2.150
  18. Kader, M. Y., & Hardianto, W. T. (2019). Ombudsman Strategy of Republic of Indonesia in East Java Representative Regarding Public Service. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 8(3), 29–36.
  19. Kurniawan, A., & Suryanto, D. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Ajudikasi Khusus Dalam Penegakan Good Governance. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 223–240.
  20. Mantili Rai. (2019). Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Praktik: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Belanda. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure, 4(2), 298–321. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalilmiahhukumdejure/article/download/6460/3229/17049
  21. Nugroho, F. (2021). Good Governance dan Peran Ganti Kerugian dalam Mencegah Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pemerintah. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 15(1).
  22. Nuraini, D. (2020). Peran Ombudsman dalam Pengawasan Administrasi Negara: Kajian terhadap Prosedur Ajudikasi Khusus. Jurnal Pengawasan Publik, 12(2).
  23. Nurlailiy, N. A. A., & Nuriskandar, L. H. (2021). PERAN OMBUDSMAN DALAM MENJAGA GOOD GOVERNANCE DI INDONESIA: ANALISIS DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM TATA NEGARA. Article, 47(4), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.31857/s013116462104007x
  24. Prasetyo, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara melalui Ajudikasi Khusus oleh Ombudsman. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik.
  25. Pratama, Z. Z. B. (2021). Kewenangan Ajudikasi Oleh Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik. Journal Equitable, 5(1).
  26. Rasji, R., Syamila, N., & Michellena, M. (2024). Penerapan Teori Trias Politika dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum, 10(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v10i1.6477
  27. Setiawan, R. (2022). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Efektivitas Ajudikasi Khusus Ombudsman RI. Jurnal Hukum & Kebijakan Publik, 11(2), 101–117.
  28. Sharma, M., & Yadav, R. (2016). Equity, Justice, and Governance: A Study of Inclusions in Good Governance. Journal of Political Science and Policy Analysis.
  29. Solechan. (2018). Memahami Peran Ombudsman Sebagai Badan Pengawas Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 1.
  30. Sutrisno, A. (2019). Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Dalam Sistem Hukum Administrasi Negara: Tinjauan terhadap Pemberian Ganti Kerugian. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi.
  31. Zhou, X., & Lee, H. (2017). Transparency and Accountabilitu in Governance: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(4). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20578911221109852
  32. Web
  33. Discussion Paper for Sustainable Development Integrating Governance in the Post-2015 Development Framework. (2014). https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Discussion-Paper--Governance-for-Sustainable-Development.pdf
  34. Eksekusi Putusan Ajudikasi Khusus dalam Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Pelayanan Publik. (n.d.). https://www.ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/pwkinternal--eksekusi-putusan-ajudikasi-khusus-dalam-tuntutan-ganti-kerugian-pelayanan-publik
  35. Good Governance and Development. (2015). United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
  36. Indonesia, O. R. (2021). Ajudikasi Khusus Ombudsman VS Komitmen Pelayanan Publik. https://www.ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--ajudikasi-khusus-ombudsman-vs-komitmen-pelayanan-publik
  37. Maurice, S., Nyarangaa, Chen, H., Dunchan, O., Hongo, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, & P, R. (n.d.). No. China. Retrieved February 7, 2025, from file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/The_Role_of_Public_Participation_in_Governance_tow.pdf
  38. Nisya, V. C. (n.d.). No Title. https://repository2.unw.ac.id/3361/6/BAB 3 - Vivit Choirul Nisya.pdf
  39. Nugraha, A. (2021). Sejarah dan Tantangan Ombudsman RI. Ombudsman RI. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--sejarah-dan-tantangan-ombudsman-ri
  40. Ombudsman, H. (2021). Sekilas Ombudsman. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. https://ombudsman.go.id/profiles/index/pftt
  41. Wang, J. (2018). Accountability and Governance: Theory and Practice. Governance Review.
  42. Wawuru, R. P. R. (n.d.). Perluasan Ruang Lingkup Kerugian iMMATERIL. Retrieved January 6, 2025, from https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel-hukum/1458-perluasan-ruang-lingkup-kerugian-immaterial