Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 15, 2024
Published
January 8, 2025
Download
download
Statistic
Read Counter : 45 Download : 29

Main Article Content

Abstract

Financial health performance will determine the progress of the cooperative. The healthier the financial performance, the more advanced and independent the cooperative will be. For this reason, it is necessary to analyze the performance of the financial reports, so that management can make the right decisions for the further development of the cooperative. The success of a cooperative will reflect the qualifications or quality of its financial health performance. The aim of this research is to determine the health performance of the financial reports of KUD Sumber Makmur Ngantang. This research method uses a case study approach. The data collection method is using primary data and secondary data. The research location is KUD Sumber Makmur Ngantang District. Poor. The financial performance analysis period is the balance sheet & profit and loss report for 2021 & 2022. This research uses the "present ratio" as a comparison, namely 1. Liquidity Ratio. 2. Solvency Ratio. 3. Activity Ratio, 4. Profitability Ratio. There are 4 health performance indicators as follows: 1. A score of 3.25 - 4.00, a score of 4 means healthy. 2. A score of 2.50 – 3.24, a score of 3 means quite healthy. 3. A score of 1.5-2.49, a score of 2 means unhealthy. 4. A score of less than 1.5, a score of 4 means unhealthy. The results of this research are an analysis of the financial health performance of KUD Sumber Makmur in 2021 of 2.73 and in 2022 of 2.58 with a standard of 2.50-3.24 which is interpreted as quite healthy. For 2022, the performance value decreased by 2.58 compared to 2021 of 2.73. The suggestions in this research are: 1. To overcome the problem of net profit margin which is still below 1%, close business units that continue to lose money, for example building shop units. 2. Develop businesses that support core businesses, for example tourism education milk & cattle.

Article Details

References

  1. Asiyah, S., Soegiarto, E., & Solihin, D. (2019). ANALISIS LAPORAN KEUANGAN DALAM MENGUKUR KINERJA KEUANGAN PADA PT. PELABUHAN INDONESIA IV (PERSERO) CABANG SAMARINDA. JMA: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi.
  2. Bambang, R. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Pembelanjaan PerusahaanIII. Gajah Mada.
  3. Blessing, H., & Sakouvogui, G. (2023). Impact of Liquidity and Solvency Ratios on Financial Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis. Indonesia Auditing Research Journal, 12(3), 102–115. https://journals.iarn.or.id/index.php/ARJ/article/view/208
  4. Dahiyat, A. A., Weshah, S. R., & Aldahiyat, M. (2021). Liquidity and Solvency Management and its Impact on Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Jordan. Journal of Asian Finance, 8(5), 135–0141. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0135
  5. Destiani, T., & Hendriyani, R. M. (2021). Analisis Rasio Keuangan untuk Menilai Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 4(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v4i1.488
  6. Gulo, I. R. P., Bate’e, M. M., & Telaumbanua, Y. N. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Koperasi Pada Koperasi Konsumen Tokosa Sahabat Sejati Kota Gunungsitoli Analysis of Cooperative Financial Performance in the Tokosa Sahabat Sejati Consumer Cooperative, Gunungsitoli City. Jurnal EMBA, 10(4), 1436–1444. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/emba/article/view/43970
  7. Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, 9(7), e17847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17847
  8. Ichsan, R. N., Suparmin, S., Yusuf, M., Ismal, R., & Sitompul, S. (2021). Determinant of Sharia Bank’s Financial Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1594
  9. Khidmat, W. Bin, & Rehman, M. U. (2018). IMPACT OF LIQUIDITY & SOLVENCY ON PROFITABILITY CHEMICAL SECTOR OF PAKISTAN. Analytical Biochemistry, 11(1), 1–5. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/
  10. Miftahurrohman, M., & Amelia, R. (2022). ANALISIS RASIO UNTUK MENILAI KINERJA KEUANGAN PADA PT MERCK INDONESIA TBK. Jurnal Lentera Akuntansi, 6(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrakt.v6i2.568
  11. Prahendratno, A. (2023). Analysis Of The Differences And Relevance Of Islamic And Conventional Banking Principles. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 4(6), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v4i6.751
  12. Syntha, N. (2023). Analysis Of The Differences And Relevance Of Islamic And Conventional Banking Principles. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 4(8), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v4i6.751
  13. Tolong, A., As, H., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Pada Koperasi Suka Damai. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 2(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.37479/jeej.v2i1.4455