Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 6, 2024
Published
October 9, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 172 Download : 24

Main Article Content

Abstract

The crimes that Israel has committed against the Palestinian people have sparked outrage in the international community, especially South Africa, which has begun to drag Israel to the International Court of Justice on suspicion of genocide. The International Court plays a role as a third party in fulfilling the standard principles of work as a mediator to provide a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The research method used in this journal is a qualitative method with library study research methods. This research aims to increase readers' understanding regarding the working standards of the International Court of Justice which acts as a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It was decided to bring the Israeli occupation of Palestine to the level of the International Court of Justice after the UN General Assembly (UNGA) meeting on 30 December 2022. The majority of member states voted in favour of seeking a court opinion regarding the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestine. To follow up on the UNGA, the International Court of Justice held a hearing session attended by 52 countries from 19 February 2024 to 26 February 2024. The International Court's function is to uphold international law and ensure that all parties involved in the conflict receive fair treatment. The decision resulting from the International Court of Justice trial is binding, meaning that the countries involved in the court must comply with what is stated in the decision. The interim ruling produced by the International Court of Justice emphasizes the importance of protecting human rights and compliance with the principles of international law. However, in reality, Israel is only implementing decisions such as opening humanitarian aid routes to Palestine.

Keywords

Israel Mahkamah Internasional Manajemen Konflik Palestina

Article Details

Author Biographies

M Ferry Zubair, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Mahasiswa semester 6, Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.

Muhammad Fadhil Firdaus, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Mahasiswa semester 6, Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.

Prilla Marsingga, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Dosen mata kuliah Studi Perdamaian dan Resolusi Konflik, Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik.

References

  1. Associated Press. “Mahkamah Internasional Akan Keluarkan Keputusan Awal Dalam Kasus Tuduhan Genosida Terhadap Israel.†VOA Indonesia, January 26, 2024. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/mahkamah-internasional-akan-keluarkan-keputusan-awal-dalam-kasus-tuduhan-genosida-terhadap-israel/7458249.html.
  2. BBC News Indonesia. “Sidang Mahkamah Internasional: Israel Bantah Gugatan Afrika Selatan Tentang Genosida Palestina Di Gaza – Kenapa Indonesia Tidak Bisa Ikut Menggugat?†BBC News Indonesia, January 12, 2024. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cxx313w4pyro.
  3. Fachri, Ferinda K. “Dua Pekan Pasca Putusan ICJ, Israel Terus Membangkang.†hukumonline.com, February 5, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/dua-pekan-pasca-putusan-icj--israel-terus-membangkang-lt65c1273a79868/?page=2#!
  4. Heriyanto, Dodik Setiawan Nur. “Mendesak Israel,†January 22, 2024. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/47078.
  5. Indonesia, Cnn. “Poin-Poin Penting Putusan ICJ Usai Afrika Selatan Menang Gugat Israel.†Internasional, January 26, 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20240126203103-120-1054977/poin-poin-penting-putusan-icj-usai-afrika-selatan-menang-gugat-israel.
  6. Indriawati, Tri. “Sejarah Konvensi Genosida Halaman All - Kompas.com.†KOMPAS.com, January 12, 2024. https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/2024/01/12/170700979/sejarah-konvensi-genosida?page=all.
  7. Jumhana, Enjum. “PERAN ORGANISASI INTERNASIONAL PADA PELANGGARAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ZIONIS ISRAEL TERHADAP KONFLIK DENGAN PALESTINA.†Www.Resjustitia.Lppmbinabangsa.Id, January 30, 2024. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v4i1.109.
  8. Mandra. “Putusan Mahkamah Internasional, Palestina: Impunitas Israel Telah Berakhir.†rri.co.id, January 27, 2024. Accessed March 20, 2024. https://www.rri.co.id/internasional/533302/putusan-mahkamah-internasional-palestina-impunitas-israel-telah-berakhir.
  9. Putri, Penny Kurnia. “Manajemen Konflik Dan Resolusi Konflik: Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Perdamaian.†Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations (Online) 2, no. 1 (May 30, 2022): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v2i1.1945.
  10. Redaksi. “Heboh Putusan Mahkamah Internasional Ke Israel, Dunia Respons Begini.†CNBC Indonesia, January 1, 1970. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20240211154414-4-513292/heboh-putusan-mahkamah-internasional-ke-israel-dunia-respons-begini.
  11. Ricky P.D, Mariana. “PM Palestina: Keputusan Mahkamah Internasional Berakhirnya Impunitas Israel.†Solopos, January 26, 2024. Accessed March 21, 2024. https://news.solopos.com/pm-palestina-keputusan-mahkamah-internasional-berakhirnya-impunitas-israel-1850574.
  12. Starke, J. G., and Bambang Iriana Djajaatmadja. Pengantar Hukum Internasional, 2000. http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20323848.
  13. Turangan, Doortje D. “TINDAKAN KEJAHATAN GENOSIDA DALAM KETENTUAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN HUKUM NASIONAL.†M.H thesis, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 2011. http://repo.unsrat.ac.id/225/.
  14. Webel, Charles P., and Johan Galtung. Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. Routledge eBooks, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203089163.
  15. Winarwati, Indien. “Eksistensi Mahkamah Internasional Sebagai Lembaga Kehakiman Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa (PBB).†Rechtidee 9, no. 1 (June 1, 2014): 56–71. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v9i1.415.