Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 20, 2025
Published
September 30, 2025
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 2

Main Article Content

Abstract

The selection of teaching assistants requires an objective and effective decision-making system. This study designs a decision support system for selecting assistants in the Algorithm and Basic Programming course at JTIK, Universitas Negeri Makassar, by integrating the Weighted Product (WP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. WP assigns weights to evaluation criteria, while TOPSIS identifies the best candidates based on positive and negative ideal distances. The criteria include academic performance, communication, subject mastery, and teaching experience. Testing results show that the system produces consistent selections, aligned with manual calculations and recruitment outcomes, proving its validity and effectiveness in supporting the selection process.

Keywords

Decision Support System TOPSIS Weighted Product

Article Details

References

  1. Abdi, A., Bagus W, T., Shahib, M. U., Tri, W., & Bachri, O. S. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS Student Achievement Selection Decision Support System Using the TOPSIS Method Abstrak. Jurnal Ilmiah Intech : Information Technology Journal of UMUS, 5(1), 78–84.
  2. Ahmad, I., Fatmayati, F., Sinlae, A. A. J., Sudipa, I. G. I., Alamsyah, D., Arisantoso, Muharrom, M., Ida Bagus Gede Sarasvananda, Anak Agung Gde Bagus Ariana, R. N., & Akmaludin. (2023). Metode Multi-Attribute Decision Making Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. November, 24.
  3. Anggraeny, F. T., Via, Y. Vi., & Agung, B. S. (2024). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Pemilihan Asisten Praktikum Laboratorium. 17(2), 271–277.
  4. Apriliana, M., & Nurcahyo, G. W. (2020). Akurasi Bantuan Stimulan Perumahan Swadaya (BSPS) terhadap RTLH Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v3i1.71
  5. Banjarnahor, J. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penentuan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer Dengan Metode TOPSIS Studi Kasus Laboratorium AMIK MBP. LOFIAN: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 1(2), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.58918/lofian.v1i2.172
  6. Berhitu, Y., Rahakbauw, D. L., & Ilwaru, V. Y. I. (2024). Application of the Weighted Product Method in Determining the Selection of Exemplary Students at Public Junior High School 67 Central Maluku. Pattimura International Journal of Mathematics (PIJMath), 3(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.30598/pijmathvol3iss1pp23-30
  7. Dafitri, H., Wulan, N., & Ritonga, H. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan WASPAS. JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer), 9(5), 1313. https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4816
  8. Hayati, N., Rahayu, S., & Saputra, T. I. (2021). Sistem Informasi Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium dengan Metode Weighted Product dan Weighted Sum Model. STRING (Satuan Tulisan Riset Dan Inovasi Teknologi), 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30998/string.v6i1.8455
  9. Hernawati, & Wahidin Ahmad Jurnaidi. (2024). Implementasi Metode TOPSIS Dalam Penentuan Dosen Favorit Berdasarkan Preferensi Mahasiswa. Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika.
  10. Irawan, A., Pasaribu, A., Herawati, N., Studi, P., Informasi, S., Tinggi, S., Informatika, M., & Komputer, D. (2025). Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi ( S I N T E K ) Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Pemilihan Mahasiswa Terbaik Dengan Metode Weighted Product (Wp) Di Stmik Kuwera. https://sintek.stmikku.ac.id/index.php/home
  11. Irfan, M., Yanuardi, & Yudaningsih, N. (2022). Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lembaga Bimbingan Belajar. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 3(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i1.195
  12. Issa, U., Saeed, F., Miky, Y., Alqurashi, M., & Osman, E. (2022). Hybrid AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Selecting Deep Excavation Support System. Buildings, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030295
  13. Kho, R. W., & Purnomo, H. D. (2023). Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Asisten Dosen Berbasis Web. JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, 7(3), 1050. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v7i3.6268
  14. Letelay, K., Mola, S. A. S., & Snae, D. P. (2023). Penerapan Metode Topsis Dalam Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Rehabilitasi Rumah. Jurnal Dialektika Informatika (Detika), 3(2), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.24176/detika.v3i2.10251
  15. Maesyaroh, S. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium di FKOM UNIKU. Nuansa Informatika, 14(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.25134/nuansa.v14i2.2913
  16. Marbun, M., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Buku Ajar Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Hasil Belajar | 1 STMIK Pelita Nusantara Medan. In Rudang Mayang Publisher (Vol. 1, Issue April).
  17. Mardayatmi, S., Defit, S., & Nurcahyo, G. W. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan bagi Penerima Bantuan Komite Sekolah Menggunakan Metode Topsis. Jurnal Sistim Informasi Dan Teknologi, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.37034/jsisfotek.v3i3.56
  18. Nurcahyani, D., Beu, L., Boling, A. A., Curtis, A., Fua, H., Kaesmetan, Y. R., Studi, P., Informatika, T., Uyelindo, S., Nusa, K., & Timur, T. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Pemilihan Perguruan Tinggi Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Topsis. 29(2), 2024.
  19. Parameswari, P. L., Astuti, I., & Ariestya, W. W. (2022). Implementasi Metode Ahp Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pariwisata Jawa Timur. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 16(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v16i1.1401
  20. Rahmayadi, A. P. U., Enri, U., & Purwantoro, P. (2021). Klasifikasi Kinerja Asisten Laboratorium Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes. Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 5(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v5i2.3261
  21. Suartini, N. K. Y., Divayana, D. G. H., & Dewi, L. J. E. (2023). Comparison Analysis of AHP-SAW, AHP-WP, AHP-TOPSIS Methods in Private Tutor Selection. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.01.03
  22. Suhartini, S., Permana, B. A. C., Purwa, L. S., & Putra, H. M. (2024). Penerapan Metode Weighted Product Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi. Infotek: Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknologi, 7(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.29408/jit.v7i1.23971
  23. Sukamto, S., Andriyani, Y., & Wahyuni, K. (2021). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Topsis. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 7(3), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v7i3.1150
  24. Supardi, S., & Mahdiana, D. (2023). Sistem Penerimaan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarcy Process (AHP) Dan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 12(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v12i1.1619
  25. Suryani, I., Sani, A., Budiyantara, A., & Pusparini, N. N. (2024). Decision Support System for Outstanding Students’ Selection Using TOPSIS. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 6(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v6i2.28