Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 19, 2025
Published
December 20, 2025
Download
PDF (Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 5 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The integration-interconnection paradigm proposed by Amin Abdullah seeks to address the long-standing dichotomy between religious sciences and general sciences, which has often hindered the development of Islamic knowledge. While offering a holistic approach, the application of this paradigm within the context of Islamic law still faces resistance from conservative groups and a lack of systematic, applicable methodology. This issue has led to Islamic law often being perceived as static and unable to respond to contemporary issues such as Islamic economics, the environment, and human rights. This study aims to explore the opportunities and challenges of applying the integration-interconnection paradigm in the study of Islamic law. Using a qualitative method with a literature review approach, this research analyzes the works of Amin Abdullah and relevant secondary literature. Content analysis is employed to identify gaps in application, relevance, and strategies needed to overcome these obstacles. The results indicate that this paradigm holds significant potential for creating Islamic law that is responsive, relevant, and adaptable to the needs of the era. It successfully unites the normative aspects of religion with the historical reality of society through an interdisciplinary approach. However, conservative resistance and the lack of operational methodological guidance remain major barriers. Therefore, the development of a more inclusive applied methodology and strengthening interdisciplinary dialogue are necessary to ensure this paradigm can be optimally applied in the study of modern Islamic law

Keywords

Integration-Interconnection Amin Abdullah Islamic law A Holistic Paradigm

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abdullah, Amin. Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi : Pendekatan Integratif- Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
  2. ———. Studi Agama: Normativitas Atau Historisitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996.
  3. Abdullah, Muhammad Amin. Islam Sebagai Ilmu: Epistemologi, Metodologi, dan Etika. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
  4. ———. “Islamic Studies di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 50, No. 2 (2012): 391–426. https://aljamiah.or.id/index.php/AJIS/article/view/79.
  5. ———. “Religion, Science, and Culture: An Integrated, Interconnected Paradigm of Science.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 52, No. 1 (2014): 175–203. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.175-203.
  6. Akmal, Muhammad Ichsanul. “Pemikiran Amin Abdullah Seputar Integrasi Keilmuan.” Fathir: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1, No. 2 (2024): 120–36.
  7. Amin Abdullah. Integrasi Sains-Islam Mempertemukan Epistimologi Islam dan Sains. Yogyakarta: Pilar Media, 2004.
  8. ———. Islamic Stadies dalam Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2007.
  9. Amin Abdullah, M. “Bangunan Baru Epistemologi Keilmuan Studi Hukum Islam dalam Merespon Globalisasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum, 46, No. 2 (2012): 315–68.
  10. Dasrizal, Budiman, Muhammad Suhail, and Raihan Pradipta. “Integrative Knowledge and Contemporary Issues: Evaluating Amin Abdullah’s Paradigm of Multidisciplinarity.” Islamic Thought Review, 2, No. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/itr.v2i1.8408 Islamic.
  11. Dewi Masyitoh, Rahma Dewi Mustika, Ahilla Salma Alfaza, A F Hidayatullah. “Amin Abdullah dan Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi.” JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), 4, No. 1 (2020): 81–88. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v4i1.5973.
  12. Fauzi Aly Mustofa, Ahmad Arifi, Muhammad Muhtadi. “Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Studi Islam di Perguruan Tinggi.” Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9, No. 1 (2024): 5061–77.
  13. Fitriani, Mohamad Iwan. “The Oneness of God behind the Local Tradition of Nusantara Islam: Theo-Anthropological Perspective with Interpretive Paradigm on Nusantara Islam Sasak Lombok.” Ulumuna: Jornal of Islamic Studies, 19, No. 2 (2015): 413–36. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v19i2.334.
  14. Fiyantika, F T P, and F L Nisa. “Tantangan Ekonomi Syariah dalam Menghadapi Masa Depan di Era Globalisasi.” Economic and Business Management … 6, No. 2 (2024): 105–12.
  15. Furoidah, Nur Lailatun. “Islam dan Sains: Telaah Terhadap Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan, Pengilmuan Islam, dan Paradigma Integrasi Interkoneksi-Transintegrasi Ilmu.” Madinah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 7, No. 2 (2020): 266–81.
  16. Gunawan, Khairol, Agus Rizal, Cut Yessi Andriani, Fahrul Rozi, M. Surya Fadillah, Dedi Iskandar, Muliadi Muliadi, M. Arif Ridwan, Maidy Ramadhan, and Rafsanjani Ramadhan. “Tranformasi Peradilan Islam: Menganalisis Penegakan Hukum dalam Masyarakat Modern.” JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 1, No. 1 (2024): 38–52.
  17. Haq, Moh Mansur Abdul. “Urgensi Aneka Pendekatan dalam Kajian Islam: dari Inter-Multidisiplin ke Transdisiplin Menurut Amin Abdullah.” Medina-Te: Jurnal Studi Islam, 19, No. 1 (2023): 104–16.
  18. Herawati, Aulia, Ulil Devia Ningrum, and Herlini Puspika Sari. “Wahyu Sebagai Sumber Utama Kebenaran dalam Pendidikan Islam : Kajian Kritis Terhadap Implementasinya di Era Modern.” SURAU: Journal of Islamic Education, 2, No. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/surau.v3i1.8713 SURAU.
  19. Hidayat, Muslih. “Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif: Tinjauan Paradigmatik dan Implementatif dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Ta’dib, 19, No. 02 (2014): 276–90.
  20. Hidayati, Vitania, and Muzaiyana. “Umat Islam dan Modernitas : Menjaga Relevansi di Era Perubahan.” In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Mahasiswa Sejarah Peradaban Islam (KONMASPI), Vol. 1, 2024.
  21. Huda, Khoirul, and Muhammad Najihul Huda. “Harmonisasi Agama dan Kemajuan: Manfaat Integrasi Keilmuan Islam dalam Era Kontemporer.” Journal of Islamic Education, 10, No. 1 (2024): 146–62. https://doi.org/10.18860/jie.v11i1.24012.
  22. Jasmadi, Adnin AS, and Muhammad Yusuf Zulkifli. “Pendekatan Interdisipliner dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer: Pengembangan Kolaborasi Antara Ulama dan Intelektual Muslim.” Jurnal Ikhtibar Nusantara, 3, No. 1 (2024): 139–50. https://doi.org/10.62901/j-ikhsan.v3i1.119.
  23. Khufaya, Jihad, Muhammad Kholil, and Nurrohman Syarif. “Fenomena Hukum Islam di Masa Modern; Upaya Harmonisasi Antara Eksistensi dan Relevansi.” Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4, No. 2 (2021): 128–47. https://doi.org/10.47971/mjhi.v4i2.366.
  24. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Sage Publications, 2018.
  25. Maksudin, Mohamad Yasin Yusuf, Robingun. Thinking Map Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Agama dan Sains-Teknologi (Berbasis Al Qur’an-Al Hadis dan Sunnatullah). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta., 2020.
  26. Manik, Robbi Hardiansyah, Fadhil Muhammad Dzaki, Amalia Azzahra, Juanda Pramu Yudistira, and Fitria Mayasari. “Peran Ijtihad dalam Menjawab Tantangan Hukum Islam di Era Modern.” Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum, 2, No. 6 (2024): 118–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v2i6.1411.
  27. Mardiah, Mardiah, and Syaifuddin Sabda. “Multi, Inter, and Transdisciplinary Islamic Education (A Theoretical Review on Islam Perspective).” Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora 2, No. 1 (2022): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v2i1.665.
  28. Miftahuddin, M. (Miftahuddin). “Integrasi dan Interkoneksi Studi Hukum Islam dengan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial.” Al-´Adalah, 10, No. 3 (2012): 301–12.
  29. Muhammad Holid, Amril M, Eva Dewi. “Integrasi Agama dan Sains dalam Perspektif M. Amin Abdullah.” Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 6, No. 1 (2024): 613–24.
  30. Mukhis, Febri Hijroh. “International Human Right and Islamic Law: Sebuah Upaya Menuntaskan Wacana-Wacana Kemanusiaan.” Muslim Heritage, 2, No. 1 (2017): 1. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v2i1.1043.
  31. Munawir, S, and Tobroni Tobroni. “Model Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Integrasi-Interkoneksi: Analisis Pendekatan Pohon Ilmu, Jaring Laba-Laba, dan Twin Tower.” Karakter: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 1, No. 4 (2024): 169–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/karakter.v1i4.203.
  32. Musliadi. “Epistemologi Keilmuan dalam Islam: Kajian Terhadap Pemikiran M. Amin Abdullah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Fatura, 13, No. 2 (2014): 160–83.
  33. Niam, Khoirul, and Rustam Ibrahim. “Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer: Pendekatan Integratif- Interkonektif.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 07, No. 1 (2025): 160–70.
  34. Parluhun Siregar. “Integrasi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dalam Perspektif M. Amin Abdullah.” Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 38, No. 2 (2018): 335–54.
  35. Qolbiyah, Aini, Amril M Amril M, and Zulhendri Zulhendri. “Konsep Integrasi Agama dan Sains Makna dan Sasarannya.” Jurnal Basicedu, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i3.5711.
  36. Rambe, Uqbatul Khair. “Pemikiran Amin Abdullah.” Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam, 1, No. 2 (2019): 146–75. https://doi.org/10.51900/alhikmah.v1i2.4850.
  37. Ridwan, Kurniati, and Misbahuddin. “Relevansi Fungsi dan Tujuan Hukum Islam dalam Era Modern.” Al-Mutsla, 5, No. 2 (2023): 390–404. https://doi.org/10.46870/jstain.v5i2.838.
  38. Riyanto, Waryani Fajar. Integrasi-Interkoneksi Keilmuan: Biografi Intelektual M. Amin Abdullah. Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2013.
  39. Rohmanu, Abid. “Paradigma Hukum Islam Teoantroposentris: Telaah Paradigmatis Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman dan Abdullah Saeed.” Kodifikasia, 13, No. 1 (2019): 33. https://doi.org/10.21154/kodifikasia.v13i1.1679.
  40. Setyowati, Nurwastuti. “Interkoneksi Agama, Sosial dan Budaya dalam Pendidikan Islam.” Journal of Islamic Education and Innovation, 3, No. 1 (2022): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.26555/jiei.v3i1.6086.
  41. Siswanto. “Perspektif Amin Abdullah Tentang Integrasi-Interkoneksi dalam Kajian Islam.” Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 3, No. 2 (2015): 376. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.2.376-409.
  42. Sofyan, Idha Fadhilah, Sirajuddin, and Misbahuddin. “Empat Konsep Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam Ibnu Khaldun dan Penerapannya di Pasar Terong Makassar.” Jurnal Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia, 10, No. 2 (2023): 213–32. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v10i2.8744.
  43. Sufratman. “Integrasi Agama dan Sains Modern di Universitas Islam Negeri Integration of Religion and Modern Sains At State Islamic.” Al-Afkar, 5, No. 1 (2022): 209–28.
  44. Tajuddin, Tabrani, and Neny Muthiatul Awwaliyah. “Paradigma Integrasi-Interkoneksi Islamisasi Ilmu dalam Pandangan Amin Abdullah.” Aksiologi : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 1, No. 2 (2021): 56–61. https://doi.org/10.47134/aksiologi.v1i2.11.
  45. Yudha, Alda Kartika. “Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif: Perbedaan, Hubungan, dan Pandangan Ulama.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 8, No. 2 (2017): 157. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v8i2.a7019.
  46. Yulanda, Atika. “Epistemologi Keilmuan Integratif-Interkonektif M. Amin Abdullah dan Implementasinya dalam Keilmuan Islam.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 18, No. 1 (2019): 79–104. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v18i1.87.
  47. Yusup, Adi Abdilah. “Agama dan Penghormatan pada Martabat Manusia dalam Perspektif Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im.” Jurnal Ilmiah Falsafah: Jurnal Kajian Filsafat, Teologi dan Humaniora, 10, No. 2 (2024): 107–23. https://doi.org/10.37567/jif.v10i2.3035.