Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 24, 2025
Published
June 30, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 34 Download : 17

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the impact of asymmetric information in risk determination within Peer to Peer (P2P) lending syariah from the perspective of fiqh muamalah. The research employs Normative Legal Research by analyzing Islamic legal principles and relevant laws to understand how fiqh muamalah addresses asymmetric information in P2P lending risk determination. The study finds that asymmetric information in P2P lending poses significant risks, such as adverse selection and moral hazard, which are contrary to Islamic financial principles. Fiqh muamalah emphasizes transparency and fairness in transactions, offering solutions through mechanisms like enhanced disclosure and Shariah-compliant contracts to mitigate these risks. By fostering transparency and ethical financial practices, this research contributes to the stability and growth of the Islamic financial sector, promoting sustainable economic development. The implementation of these measures is expected to enhance Sharia financial inclusion and strengthen the Islamic economic ecosystem in Indonesia.

Keywords

Fiqh Muamalah Asymmetric Information Peer to Peer Lending Risk Determination Islamic Finance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abdulloh Munir. “Peer To Peer Lending Analysis of Sharia Maqashid Perspective.” Qawãnïn Journal of Economic Syaria Law 7, No. 1 (2023): 34–67. https://doi.org/10.30762/qaw.v7i1.231.
  2. Arvanitis, Angelo, Jonathon Gregory, and Richard Martin. “Hedging Financial Risks Subject to Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Risk Finance 1, No. 2 (2000): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb043441.
  3. Bharath, Sreedhar T., Paolo Pasquariello, and Guojun Wu. “Does Asymmetric Information Drive Capital Structure Decisions?” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.789725.
  4. Byanjankar, Ajay. “Predicting Credit Risk in Peer-to-Peer Lending with Survival Analysis.” In 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2017 - Proceedings, 2018–January:1–8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2017.8280927.
  5. Chen, Xiao, Bihong Huang, and Mohamed Shaban. “Naïve or Sophisticated? Information Disclosure and Investment Decisions in Peer to Peer Lending.” Journal of Corporate Finance 77 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101805.
  6. Chen, Yen Ru, Jenq Shiou Leu, Sheng An Huang, Jui Tang Wang, and Jun Ichi Takada. “Predicting Default Risk on Peer-to-Peer Lending Imbalanced Datasets.” IEEE Access 9 (2021): 73103–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079701.
  7. Cummins, Mark, Theo Lynn, Ciarán Mac an Bhaird, and Pierangelo Rosati. “Addressing Information Asymmetries in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending.” in Palgrave Studies in Digital Business and Enabling Technologies, 15–31, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_2.
  8. Falaschetti, Dino, and Michael J. Orlando. “Asymmetric Information.” In Money, Financial Intermediation and Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441347.00026.
  9. Farikhin, Ahmad, and Heni Mulyasari. “Gharar, Fraud and Dispute in Islamic Business Transaction an Islamic Law Perspectives.” International Economic and Finance Review 1, No. 2 (2022): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.56897/iefr.v1i2.18.
  10. Fithria, Annisa. “Exploring the Application of Sharia Contracts on Islamic Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending in Indonesia.” Al-Hikmah: International Journal of Islamic Studies and Human Sciences 5, No. 6 (2022): 31–56. https://doi.org/10.46722/hikmah.v5i6.327.
  11. Freedman, Seth, and Ginger Zhe Jin. “Do Social Networks Solve Information Problems for Peer-to-Peer Lending? Evidence from Prosper.Com.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1936057.
  12. Hidayatullah, Muhammad Syarif, and Rahmat Fadillah. “Economic and Legal Dimensions of Collateral Existence in Modern Mudhārabah Contracts: Understanding the Relationship between Risk Management, National Law, and Contemporary Fiqh.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 16, No. 2 (2022): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6860.
  13. Khasanudin, Khasanudin, and Budi Santoso. “Analysis of Financial Technology Product Contracts Peer to Peer Lending Syariah Platform Ammana.Id.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 3, No. 2 (2022): 185–214. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i2.54623.
  14. Lotfi, Farhad, Hassan Abolghasem Gorji, Ghadir Mahdavi, and Mohammad Hadian. “Asymmetric Information in Iranian’s Health Insurance Market: Testing of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.” Global Journal of Health Science 7, No. 6 (2015): 146–55. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p146.
  15. Maulana, Irwan. “Implementasi Qawaid Fiqhiyyah dalam Ekonomi dan Industri Keuangan Syariah.” Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah 19, No. 2 (2018): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v19i2.34.
  16. Negara, Tunggul Ansari Setia. “Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches.” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, No. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855.
  17. Permana, Iwan. “Penerapan Kaidah-Kaidah Fiqih dalam Transaksi Ekonomi di Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam) 3, No. 1 (2020): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v3i1.5617.
  18. Prawiro, Atmo. “Aktualisasi Akad dalam Fikih Muamalah bagi Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.” Tasyri’ : Journal of Islamic Law 1, No. 2 (2022): 215–52. https://doi.org/10.53038/tsyr.v1i2.30.
  19. Taekema, Sanne. “Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice.” Law and Method, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000031.
  20. Takidah, Erika, and Salina Kassim. “The Shariah Compliance of Islamic Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Practices in Indonesia: Identification of Issues and the Way Forward.” ICR Journal 13, No. 1 (2022): 72–91. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v13i1.830.
  21. Trimulato, Trimulato, M. Cholil Nafis, and Euis Amalia. “The Role Sharia Fintech Support Sustanaible Development Goals Program (SDGs).” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam 8, No. 1 (2022): 251. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.3911.
  22. Wei, Xinyuan, Bo Yu, and Yao Liu. “Accessing Information Asymmetry in Peer-to-Peer Lending by Default Prediction from Investors’ Perspective.” Symmetry 12, No. 6 (2020): 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060935.
  23. Xia, Yufei, Lingyun He, Yinguo Li, Nana Liu, and Yanlin Ding. “Predicting Loan Default in Peer-to-Peer Lending Using Narrative Data.” Journal of Forecasting 39, No. 2 (2020): 260–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2625.
  24. Younes Soualhi. “Application of Sharī‘ah Contracts in Contemporary Islamic Finance : A Maqāṣid Perspective.” Intellectual Discourse 23, No. Special Issue (2015): 333–54.
  25. Yuliatul Hijriah, Hanifiyah, Prinintha Nanda Soemarsono, Himmatul Kholidah, and Bani Alkausar. “Increasing Smes Business Value Through Sharia Peer to Peer Lending Accessibility Education.” Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Services) 7, No. 2 (2023): 208–19. https://doi.org/10.20473/jlm.v7i2.2023.208-219.